<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yesterday&#8217;s Most Successful Companies Wouldn&#8217;t IPO Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/</link>
	<description>all about ipos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:29:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What Will it Take to Go Public in 2012?</title>
		<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>What Will it Take to Go Public in 2012?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipo-dashboards.com/?p=293#comment-469</guid>
		<description>[...] about the IPO market that they were in 2001. In fact opinions are eerily similiar. My last post, Yesterday’s Most Successful Companies Wouldn’t IPO Today, suggested that today&#8217;s tough IPO standards are likely doing more harm than good. This post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about the IPO market that they were in 2001. In fact opinions are eerily similiar. My last post, Yesterday’s Most Successful Companies Wouldn’t IPO Today, suggested that today&#8217;s tough IPO standards are likely doing more harm than good. This post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipo-dashboards.com/?p=293#comment-443</guid>
		<description>For many companies there are other (often better) options for follow-on financing and liquidity events than an IPO,  (see my comment here: http://www.pehub.com/62156/yelp-helps-kill-ipo-market/ ) so I don&#039;t think the lack of an IPO market is necessarily a problem per se.  However I would agree that the existing structure of (most) venture capital is built on the assumption that on average exits will happen after 4-6 years and that no one can take liquidity until exit (ie no secondary sales) is just poor ALM (asset / liability management.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many companies there are other (often better) options for follow-on financing and liquidity events than an IPO,  (see my comment here: <a href="http://www.pehub.com/62156/yelp-helps-kill-ipo-market/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pehub.com/62156/yelp-helps-kill-ipo-market/</a> ) so I don&#8217;t think the lack of an IPO market is necessarily a problem per se.  However I would agree that the existing structure of (most) venture capital is built on the assumption that on average exits will happen after 4-6 years and that no one can take liquidity until exit (ie no secondary sales) is just poor ALM (asset / liability management.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipo-dashboards.com/?p=293#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Christian,

Neat analysis.  My expectation of the stock market is that valuations (PE ratios) will continue to drop until we see the average in the 5-9 range, or about half of where we are today.  Accordingly, I&#039;m building my business to generate (gasp!) dividends.  Needless to say, it&#039;s pretty much impossible to raise money with that perspective.  However, I think having an eye firmly on achieving early profitability is the way to go these days.  

I worked for a rocket ship (Pivotal) back in the 90&#039;s, and we spent a ton of cash without ever breaking a profit, primarily because the investors demanded it!  I think the venture capital industry needs to come up with some new ideas on what is an acceptable business model, because the 90&#039;s-style hockey-stick is simply not the way of the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian,</p>
<p>Neat analysis.  My expectation of the stock market is that valuations (PE ratios) will continue to drop until we see the average in the 5-9 range, or about half of where we are today.  Accordingly, I&#8217;m building my business to generate (gasp!) dividends.  Needless to say, it&#8217;s pretty much impossible to raise money with that perspective.  However, I think having an eye firmly on achieving early profitability is the way to go these days.  </p>
<p>I worked for a rocket ship (Pivotal) back in the 90&#8217;s, and we spent a ton of cash without ever breaking a profit, primarily because the investors demanded it!  I think the venture capital industry needs to come up with some new ideas on what is an acceptable business model, because the 90&#8217;s-style hockey-stick is simply not the way of the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Readings &#124; Problem #2</title>
		<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Readings &#124; Problem #2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipo-dashboards.com/?p=293#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] What does it take to go public today (IPO Dashboards) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What does it take to go public today (IPO Dashboards) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Received Wisdoms Of Venture Capitalists : Eric Busboom</title>
		<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>The Received Wisdoms Of Venture Capitalists : Eric Busboom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipo-dashboards.com/?p=293#comment-108</guid>
		<description>[...] done some analysis to determine how long it takes technology startups to reach $50M. His answer is about 8 years, but that value is determined from studying the top 100 technology companies in the US, ranked by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] done some analysis to determine how long it takes technology startups to reach $50M. His answer is about 8 years, but that value is determined from studying the top 100 technology companies in the US, ranked by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Chabot</title>
		<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Chabot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipo-dashboards.com/?p=293#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Steve -- Already done.  Every revenue figure in the study was inflation adjusted.  I adjusted to 2008 dollars for all companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8212; Already done.  Every revenue figure in the study was inflation adjusted.  I adjusted to 2008 dollars for all companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/09/the-slow-death-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipo-dashboards.com/?p=293#comment-74</guid>
		<description>For a truly meaningful comparison, shouldn&#039;t you adjust for today&#039;s dollars. By looking at how long it took Microsoft or Oracle to hit $50M in the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s is probably equivalent to looking at how long it takes a company today to hit $75M or $100M if you adjust for inflation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a truly meaningful comparison, shouldn&#8217;t you adjust for today&#8217;s dollars. By looking at how long it took Microsoft or Oracle to hit $50M in the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s is probably equivalent to looking at how long it takes a company today to hit $75M or $100M if you adjust for inflation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
